Professional wealth managers have long been criticised for charging more than their services are actually worth.
But getting routed by an animal that spends 20 hours a day either asleep or scratching itself is a new low.
In a recent stock-picking challenge, the UK Observer newspaper pitted a trio of investment managers against two groups of amateurs: a handful of high school students, and a house cat named Orlando.
The cat won.
Each team started the year with £5000 ($A7621) in capital to invest in five companies from the FTSE All-Share index. After each quarter, they could swap out whatever stocks they chose, if any.
While the two-legged participants picked stocks the old-fashioned way, Orlando chose by tossing a toy mouse onto a grid of numbers that designated different companies.
Things were looking up for the pros by September, when they showed a profit of £497 compared to the cat's £292.
But Orlando really turned up the heat in the last quarter of 2012, increasing his profit to an impressive £5542.60 and beating the professionals by £366. The students fell in third place.
Here was the cat's winning strategy, from the Observer: "All but one of Orlando's stocks (Morrisons) rose during the last three months of the year, including specialist plastics and foam company Filtrona, which Orlando had hastily swapped for under-performing Scottish American Investment Trust in September.
"By contrast, the professionals refused to swap any stocks at the end of the third quarter and paid the price. British Gas fell by 19 per cent and Imagination Technologies dropped by 16.8 per cent, dragging their portfolio down by an average 7.1 per cent."
This isn't the first time professionals have been beaten by "lesser" competitors. In a study by UC Berkeley's Terry Odean, he found stocks that professional fund managers sold off actually performed 3.2 per cent better annually than the ones they purchased for their clients. Taking into consideration the average 3 per cent that fund managers charge clients in fees, it's a pretty significant finding.
The cat's victory ought to make economist Burton Malkiel smile, too. It was in his controversial book A Random Walk Down Wall Street that he claimed a "blindfolded monkey" could put together an investment portfolio better than a paid professional.